Edward W. Said was born in Jerusalem, Palestine and attended schools there and in Cairo. He was a Christian Arab. He received his B.A. from Princeton and his M.A. and Ph.D. from Harvard. He is University Professor at Columbia. He is the author of Orientalism, The Question of Palestine, Covering Islam, After the Last Sky, and Culture and Imperialism.
He delivered his speech Culture and Imperialism at York University, Toronto, February 10, 1993. He was an influential writer, speaker and teacher. 1950’s he went to the USA and studied at Princeton and Howard. His writings have been translated into 26 languages. Orientalism is his most influential book which presents the Western view of the Islamic World. It is limited to the Middle East only but it covers the whole landscape occupied by 19th and 20th century. He had been a teacher of Literature (Comparative) and made critical and literary analysis of most writers literary allusions are frequently found in his political works. He died on 25th September, 2003.
Said’s views on Culture and Imperialism
Culture
and Imperialism is a lecture by ES. It briefly surveys the formation of
Western Culture to show that the process itself was a result of
imperialism. In defining the two terms he says that
Culture:
The
learned, accumulated experience of communities and it consists of
socially transmitted patterns of behavior. According to the
anthropologist Cliff Greety, Culture is: An ordered system of meanings and symbols in terms of which social interaction take place.
Imperialism: (According to OED may be defined as): aggressive expansion of peoples at the expense of the neighbors. This has been going on for years.
Imperialism
implies some sort of collective premeditation which means a policy
formed at home by the imperialistic force before launching an offensive
against another nation.
The Historian Solomon Modell, “Imperialism
is a policy extending a country’s power beyond its own borders for the
purpose of exploiting other lands and other peoples by establishing
economic, social and political control over them.”
Introduction to the Book
Culture
and Imperialism is an important document. ES explains his own concepts
of Culture and Imperialism. ES explains Imperialism as “the practice, the theory and the attitudes of a dominating metropolitan center that rules a distant territory.” Imperialism originated with the industrial revolution in 19th century. The British and the French held sway over a large part of the globe.
For the industrial revolution, cheap raw material
and labor was needed so for the development of the backward countries,
loud claims imperialism were made out to be need of the nations. The
slave nations were taught to regard it as a blessing. 1st world war ended the European Imperialism to some extent, but the 2nd world war brought about it. The two hot wars initiated a major cold war between USSR and the USA. Thus, Imperialism took a new shape. The USA reduced USSR and came to be the sole super power. It the USA-based Imperialism that ES targets in his works.
The book also has its literary merits like Conrad’s Heart of Darkness, E.M. Forster’s A Passage to India and many others.
Important Textual areas of his Speech
The 19th century is rise of the west for its for its dominating posture.
It grabbed lands so largely and abundantly as never before.
The industrial revolution caused imperialism.
Colonialism,
almost always a consequence of imperialism, is the implanting of
settlements on distant territories. Imperialism is simply the process or
policy of establishing or maintaining an empire.
Direct colonialism of the British in India, the French in Algeria and Morocco has largely ended but Imperialism exists. Russia acquired bordering lands and the British and the French jumped thousands of miles for occupation.
The
Soviet Union’s and America’s super power status which was enjoyed a
little less than half a century derives from very different histories
than those of Britain and France in the 19th
century. In the expansion of western empires, profit and the hope of
further profit was important – spices, sugar, slaves, cotton etc.
gold. There was very little domestic resistance to foreign dominations
in Britain & France because the superior thought it a metaphysical
obligation to rule the inferior. According to them, their imperialism
was different from that of the Romans who were for the loot but they
went there with an idea of civilizing and improving their life.
We
see in the empire nothing but a mitigated disaster for the native
people. It was their native, cultural design and need that matured
imperialism and they regret it now. Imperialism has caused dislocations,
homelessness for the Muslims, Africans and the West Indians. They have
created the troubles for Britain and France and also caused the
emergence of Soviet and later today America.
According to Arno Mayer’s telling phrase, “of the old regime”
The Willy Brandt Report, entitled North-South: A program for the
survival published in 1980. It says that the needs of the poorest
nations must be addressed. Hunger must be abolished and other problems
solved. The main purpose is power-sharing in decision making within the monetary and financial institutions.
It
is different to disagree with it. But how will the changes occur? The
post-war classification of all nations into 3 worlds, Ist, Second and
the third.
The
solution is the revised attitude to education, to urge students on
insistence of their identity, culture and democracy, thus nationalism is
the solution.
The
relationship between culture and empire is one that enables disquieting
forms of domination. Imperialism considered the mixture of cultures and
identities on a large scale, but its worst and the most paradoxical
gift was to allow people to believe that there only white, black,
western or oriental.
Imperialistic allusions from literature
He
believes that novel has been important in formation of imperialistic
attitudes, references, and experiences. He calls Robinson Crusoe “the
prototype of modern realistic novel”. He draws his arguments
particularly from the novel because he believes that “Narrative
is crucial to my argument here, my basic point being that story are at
the heart of what explorers and novelists say about strange regions of
the world, they also become the method colonized people use to assert
there an identity and the existence of their own history.”
Said further argues that narratives of emancipation and enlightenment
mobilized the people to rise against the yoke of imperialism. The
stories of Sir Walter Scott charged the Scottish nation against the
British rule. Said cites Mathew Arnold who says that culture is each
society’s reservoir of the best that has been known and thought. Literature is, no doubt, the mirror that faithfully captures and reflects the picture of culture.
He
says that his entire life was devoted to teaching culture. He developed
the habit of looking for the imperialistic implications in the stories.
He says that in Great Expectations by Charles Dickens “What
Dickens envisions for Pip, being Magwitch’s London gentlemen is roughly
equivalent to what was envisioned by English benevolence for Australia.”
Said believes that nearly all Dickens’ businessmen, wayward relatives
and frightening outsides have a fairly normal and secure connection with
Empire.
Said highly admired Joseph Conrad – a star novelist of the late Victorian period for his superb criticism of Imperialism, especially in the Heart of Darkness which is still highly relevant to the situation across the world.
Said’s message is that Imperialism is not about a moment in history, it is about a continuing interdependent discourse
between subject peoples and the dominant empire. Said’s view of the
empire and colonialism is best expressed through Fanny and Sir Thomas
from Jane Austen’s Mansfield Park which is the story of Fanny’s being
taken into Sir Thomas’s life at Mansfield Park where she eventually
adjusts into the role of mistress of “estate”. Fanny was poor. Her
parents are not capable managers of wealth. These skills she acquires
when she goes to Mansfield Park to live at 10. Said’s comment on Jane
Austen’s writings highlight the extent to which he sees in her the
reflection of empire.
No comments:
Post a Comment